Search the Knowledge Base Report a bug
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view   .    ArchiCAD-Talk Forum Index >>> Sustainable Architecture >>> Real-world elements vs composite elements in Ecodesigner
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
boatingcow
New member
New member

Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 15
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:44 pm    Post subject: Real-world elements vs composite elements in Ecodesigner Reply with quote

Hi everyone,

I have searched around for information on whether Ecodesigner will give realistic results if I model a building using real-world elements. That is to say, if I model a timber-frame house with insulation panels, services void, breather cavity, etc. would Ecodesigner give a different result compared to modelling with simplified ArchiCAD composite walls? The same applies to a steel-framed building with insulation panels etc. Before anyone asks why I don't just use composites, it's because we are really going down the virtual-building route to create realistic bills of materials, cutting shedules, construction phases etc.

A related question is to do with doors and windows. As ArchiCAD doors and windows are linked to their 'walls', and if I'm not modelling the walls, but rather the components that make up the walls, then I'd need a work-around. At the moment I make a 'dummy' wall of air-space material the exact dimension of the door/window, then place the door/window so that none of the wall is visible. I'm not sure if I continue with this method whether I should replace the 'air space' material with something that has the same average u-value as the window?

As far as I understand, the zone surfaces must touch a building object for Ecodesigner to include it in the calculation. Is this limited to the 'standard' ArchiCAD building elements, or would any old Morph, object do?

Thanks for your help!

_________________
ArchiCAD 17 | InterPro | Intel i7-4790K | 32GB RAM | Nvidia Quadro K2200 4GB | Windows 10 Pro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message    
B.E.A.T.
Junior member
Junior member

Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 50
Location: Ghent, Belgium

PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Real-world elements vs composite elements in Ecodesigner Reply with quote

Global Ecodesigner calculation should be more accurate with 'real life' objects, as it works with the real 3D geometry and not with mathematical simplifications as in 'professional' energy simulation packages. Haven't tested this out though.

What has been researched and proven, is that the Thermal Bridge simulation is as accurate as e.g. Bisco and Trisco (when using walls as simple as the 'blocks' within these programs) and - furterhermore - is more exact when using detailled drawings for analyses...

_________________
(,)_\,,/

www.offbeat.be
Archicad 20 BE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message    
Display posts from previous:   
View previous topic :: View next topic
Post new topic   Reply to topic   printer-friendly view       ArchiCAD-Talk Forum Index >>> Sustainable Architecture >>> Real-world elements vs composite elements in Ecodesigner All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright 2012 - Graphisoft SE. All rights reserved worldwide. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy